The guy (and it most certainly was a guy) who invented beige carpets needs to be shot. And as for the guy who thought of installing them in rental properties… I don’t have a good enough imagination for a suitable punishment for him. Grr
Monthly Archives: May 2006
The books that shaped my life
(What is it with my family and it’s love affairs with assorted antiquated modes of transport? If it’s not steam trains, it is biplanes, or … Oh, you name it, there will be a member of the family obsessed with it. This post has been written whilst chugging down the Grand Union Canal (and chugging is the appropriate term) on our way to Little Venice for the weekend. Thankfully, whilst obsessed with travelling the old-fashioned way, my father still likes to keep up with the Jones’ and I’m using a laptop instead of pen and paper.)
I am not one to readily buy into, or trust, ‘self-help’ books. I find something mildly repellent about the idea that the secret to being a ‘better’ person can be bought and delivered to your door for £6.99 (+ P&P) from Amazon. I am not denying that some people do benefit from things they learn in books – after all, most modern civilizations comprise “people of the Book”, be that book the Bible, the Torah, the Qur’an – I am simply stating my own personal preference for working things out for myself. Ascribing to a philosophy culled from a book, most likely written by a fraud (or at least someone who wouldn’t recognise good prose if they tripped over it in the street) is just not the way I like to operate.
All of which makes it doubly embarrassing when you realise you are reading a book and it is subtly, sometimes drastically, changing the way you view life, even more so when it has a direct impact on how you live your life.
For the purposes of this post I have tried to pick out the few main books that have substantially influenced my ways of thinking. Considering the amount I have read over the years, this was no easy task. None of the books mentioned below were read in isolation – take them merely as landmarks in a lifetime characterised by a love of the written word. (They are listed in chronological order, as at different points in my life each has been more or less important to me than others).
Number One would have to be the Bible.
I was brought up C. of E. and until the age of nine or ten went every Sunday to Sunday School and Church. I was baptised, my father did volunteer work for our local church (St. John’s in Glastonbury), and I said my prayers every night when I went to bed. More importantly, I genuinely believed that God was watching out for me – I had a genuine faith, albeit a child-like and innocent faith. Things started to change around the time I was eleven or twelve – people I loved were dying, often times after horrendous amounts of pain, and I had to question where was a God who could let this happen? There was incalculable amounts of suffering in the world and, again, trusting in God didn’t seem to be doing much good. Indeed, many attrocities were done in the name of God. When a child looses its innocence is never a good time, and for some reason, for me it bit particularly hard.
The first time I was conscious of my loss of belief in the system I had been brought up in was when, at the age of 13, I had to go in for some very major surgery. As a minor, my parents signed the consent forms, but I (always precocious) wanted to know what I was being let in for. One of the questions on the form was “what religion are you” – in case things went a bit Pete Tong, the hospital wanted to make sure the right minister was on hand. Without asking me, Dad had filled it in “C. of E.”. Well, as far as he was concerned, that’s what we were. Only, seeing it down in black and white like that made me realise that no, I wasn’t C. of E. I wasn’t sure what I was, but I was sure that everything I had unquestionably believed in up till then no longer worked for me. It just didn’t answer the questions I had. Despite this, despite whatever I believe now, the Bible undoubtedly shaped how I approach life. Everything, from the holidays I celebrate (Christmas, Easter), the need to do good deeds and be nice to my neighbour, to how I swear, to my concept of an afterlife (fluffy clouds, or burning pit), and to a palpable sense of the Holy I still feel when confronted by great beauty (I was in St. Paul’s at the weekend – say what you like about the Christians, they sure have some mighty fine architecture), are influenced by that early education.
Number Two would be “The Darkness Visible” by William Styron.
For a little book, this did a lot for me. From the age of fifteen, I have battled with severe and recurring depression. Until the age of twenty, I didn’t tell anyone this, not even my family. I just… pretended. My personality flipped from happy, bubbly fourteen year old to bitter, reclusive ninteen year old, and because it just kept on like that, everyone accepted that that was how I was now. Everyone changes during puberty, right? My change just wasn’t so pleasant. After hitting rock bottom one time too many, I finally pulled myself to a doctor and admitted that something wasn’t right. God knows how I lasted five years in the state I was in, or what made me finally say “enough is enough”, but say it I did. Telling the doctor that I just wasn’t happy was surprisingly hard. I had barely admitted it to myself, so saying it to another was tough. Thankfully, she didn’t laugh me out the room. She proscribed me anti-depressants, which gave me a much needed breathing space, and got me in to see a councilor, which helped me start to address some of what had been going on in my head.
Part of all this confronting things was to tell my family that I wasn’t happy. Phenomenally hard – it’s bad enough to tell your Mum and Dad that you’re not happy, but to tell them that you have been unhappy for five years? As I said, hard, but necessary and worth it. They were, still are, remarkably supportive, and understanding. My brother scoured bookstores in the States, looking for one particular book a friend had said had helped him, and finally found a copy in Chicago. It was “Darkness Visible”, and reading it was a revelation. Here was someone else experiencing exactly the same things I was experiencing, dealing with them, and writing about his life in a way that was touching, funny, and totally honest. When I reread the book now, I appreciate the writing more than I did at first, but I am still struck most by the honesty with which he admitted to what he was feeling. Not only was Styron brave enough to face up to what was going on in his head, he was brave enough to put his entire life out in public, warts and all, in an effort to further understanding of this disease. If he could face depression with such grace and strength, why couldn’t I?
Number Three – “The Skull Mantra” by Elliot Pattison.
As already mentioned, despite my early introduction to C.of E., by my early teens I was casting about for something else, some other belief system that made sense to me. Where I grew up, Glastonbury, is often called the New Age capital of Britain. There is a healthy New Age and Alternative population, and you can’t turn around on the High Street without bumping into someone wearing tie-dye or with their hair in dreadlocks. Every other shop, it seems, is an Alternative bookshop, or vegan cafe, or sells crystals. This certainly…shaped… my outlook on life, and made me more willing to try different things. Despite this, my first real introduction to Buddhism was in Pattison’s Tibetan murder mystery. His characters, while admittedly stereotypical and archetypal, dealt with situations in a way that struck a deep cord with me.
I wouldn’t say this book made me Buddhist, but it opened my eyes to a different way of living, and how it is possible to live with adverse situations and still maintain grace and dignity. It made me want to learn more about Buddhism, and introduced me to the words of the Dalai Lama. I’m not Buddhist, just as I’m not a Christian, a Jew, or anything else. I am a hodge-podge of different things that make sense to me – my own personal belief system that is impossible to verbalise, but shapes how I try to live my life. There are however, elements of Buddhism in the mix: an understanding that to take life, for whatever reason, is wrong; a reliance on yourself to get out of scrapes and situations, not an abdication of responsibility to a higher being. That isn’t to say that that higher being does not exist, just that he/she has better things to do than to scurry around after humanity clearing up the mess. “Be good to one another” is an easy thing to say (and brings me perilously close to quoting Bill & Ted) but it comes close to the core of things. Work hard to make things better in this life, and next time around, you might just get a pleasant surprise.
Which brings me to book Four, the book that spawned this mammoth bout of introspection in the first place:
“Yes Man” by Danny Wallace.
It is more than a little ashaming to say that a bespectacled, twenty-something chap, with a haircut perilously close to a mullet, is the guy who gives you a kick up the khyber and makes you change your life, but that’s pretty much what happened. You might have seen his “How to start a country” show on BBC2 last summer – if you didn’t, you missed one of the greatest shows on TV, it was hillarious! For my birthday (the real one) last year, Moose got me his book “Yes Man”, which is all about how Danny started to say “yes” to everything instead of “no”. The book is laugh out loud funny, and a must read, regardless, but it also made me think. I identified all to well with the Danny at the start of the book – the Danny who stayed at home every night with the TV and a mug of tea for company, the Danny who made pathetic excuses to get out of any and every invitation. This was me! I had settled into a rut and, perhaps most distressingly, was happy in this rut. If saying “yes” could work so well for Danny, why not for me? I wouldn’t go quite to the extremes that Danny did in the book – nothing would make me say “yes” to trying unidentified substances in Amsterdam, for example, or to fall for obvious Internet scams – but in my day to day life there were a miriad of things I could say “yes” to.
The last few months of 2005 saw me, once again, falling backwards into depression. This time, at least, I recognised what was happening and took myself off to seek a councellor before the GP had to stuff medication down my throat again. When returning to a (more or less) even keel co-insided with my finding a job with a group of wonderful people, I became determined that I would become “yes girl”! If someone asked me out, I would say “yes” before casting around for my customary “er, I have something else on, sorry…” If someone said something nice to me, I would say “thank you” and smile, instead of immediately going “no, no, you’re wrong. I don’t look nice in this top…” There have been times when I have lapsed (Neko’s birthday party for one), but “yes” got me an interview with the OUP (sadly, not the job, but I still got a nice day in Oxford and to see the Brainy Snail again), “yes” has got me some lovely new friends, and “yes” might even be taking me to salsa dancing lessons. It sounds such a ridiculously simple thing, but it really has helped me become a more positive, and happy, person. I still have bad days – who doesn’t? – but I enjoy even the bad days. I am, all things taken into consideration, happy, and to say that (and mean it) is an immense deal for me. I am enjoying my life and I wouldn’t change a single thing. Well, more money would be nice but I’m having to live in the real world here
So there you have it, the four books that have, in one way or another, made me who I am today. Two of them, a murder mystery and the diary of a bespectacled radio producer are probably some of the odder self-help books out there, but that is the beauty of good writing – it makes you question and look at things anew, regardless. I frequently signpost my life with books – every book I have read has memories, connotations, and an impact – but some are bigger way-markers than others. With regards shaping the personality capable of sitting at a computer and typing these words? These are the biggest. What about you – what books would you say shaped you and made you who you are today?
Posted by in Daily Waffle
Buckle up Dorothy, ‘cos Kansas is going bye-bye
Well, the week (and a day) is up and I have returned to the bosom of my blogging-buddies. If I’m not totally back on top of the world, I am at least approaching the summit. Thank you again for all the emails and lovely comments you’ve left me – it’s always nice to know that there are people around that care.
To cut a long story short, the CC and myself have decided to call it a day. Whilst I know of long-distance relationships that work, in our case it was just too hard and not fair on either of us. So that’s the whole grizzly story behind why I decided to hide for a week (and a day). Sad, but not end-of-the-world kind of stuff. I am a bit embarrassed at how it knocked me for six actually, but there you are – it happened, it’s over, I went a bit girly and pathetic for a while, but it’s done with now. Time to look to the future and all that rot.
In other news, I hadn’t realised how much time I spent thinking about/working on the blog till I took a rest from it for a week. Even then I was checking for new comments almost compulsively during the day and clearing out the Akismet queue with monotonous regularity (what is it about Bright Meadow that makes spam-bots think it is a perfect target for a certain sort of unsavory porn?). Not posting meant I wasn’t getting new comments, and I hadn’t realised how much I enjoyed checking to see what had been added overnight till there wasn’t anything to check
(Hint, hint, Cas needs cheering up so get commenting!
)
So, back to the blogging with a vengeance. I’ve got lots of lovely posts lined up, more installments of the Bright Cast, and oodles upon ooooodles*1* of wonderful things that I found on the Web and want to share with you all. Hold on your hats, people!
Endnotes:
1. I just love the word ooooodles. Don’t you?
Posted by in Daily Waffle
Hermit Update
Thank you for all your comments, emails, and offers of cups of tea the last couple of days. I know I haven’t really responded, but it has meant a lot to me. I’m working my way back towards brain being in, if not full, then approaching full, working order.
Just to let you know, I will be back in full blogging mode as of Monday 29th May (evening).
I’m off for a trip in the boat this weekend with the Crazy Canalman. The plan is to go into Little Venice again, then moor up and most likely end up tiling the bathroom. My family is very odd. I go home for the weekend and within five minutes of walking through the door I am defrosting the freezer, or lumping ten bags of peat up the garden, or chopping down hedges, redecorating the new house, or other equally demanding and non-restful tasks. Quite why we’re going to tile the bathroom whilst in the middle of London escapes me, but as Farv points out – when you live on a boat, it doesn’t matter where you do the DIY, so you might as well change the scenery once in a while. I might also see if I can wangle a shopping trip for some cherry-red cowboy boots, but that depends how much he falls for the whole “only daughter in need of cheering up” routine
All of these fun and frolics do mean that there will be no Sunday Roast this week. I’ll see what I can do about making a Monday Meal instead.
Again, huggles and love to y’all, and have a lovely weekend
Posted by in Daily Waffle
Towel Day, in Remembrance of Douglas Adams
So when I said I wouldn’t be posting, clearly I meant I wouldn’t be posting anything of substance for the next few days.
Turns out May 25th is towel day.
For fans of Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, this will mean something. If you’re not a fan, then you probably won’t be carrying round a towel all day, so you can ignore the rest of this post and go back to doing something constructive.
I will be. Then, I will also be going to the gym after work, and by ‘carry’ I mean ‘have in my gym bag’. But it will be accessible, and in close proximity to my person (under/on my desk) all day, and that is the important thing.
Will you be carrying a towel tomorrow?
Posted by in Daily Waffle
Latest use for coComment
(I’m not really posting this. I’m still in major hermit-mode, but I had to share this before I forgot. Memory retention of a brain injured goldfish, that’s me).
*delurks*
I’ve found another use for coComment – verifying if something is spam or not.
It works like this:
I have Bright Meadow set up to record every comment people make (mwhahahhaaa! I’m keeping my eye on you!). coComment will only collect the comment, however, if someone has actually hit the ‘submit’ button on the comment form.
So, if a sneaky little spam-bot has left a comment, coComment doesn’t track it.
Occasionally, comments get through Akismet that are ambiguous. It could be spam, it could be a comment left by a nice person (case in point, one I had tonight that said “I love this site, good work…”) with a proper name, and a url that isn’t too obviously a spam blog. Now, sometimes I might let a comment like that slide, especially if I remove the URL from the comment, but if I do that Akismet doesn’t learn, so I am spammed forever more.
Dealing with one or two of these tonight, I realised that if they aren’t listed on Bright Meadow’s coComment page, the chances are, they weren’t left by a human.
Well, I wouldn’t want to delete a comment that was genuinely saying nice things about me now, would I?
*relurks*
Posted by in Daily Waffle
Uh, ok. Back to reality
Ok, so I just realised the down-side to more or less blogging your life. Turns out, there are things you just don’t want to discuss on a website. At least not right now.
Please excuse me while I go take my head, sit in a dark corner, watch lots and lots of Battlestar Galactica and almost certainly the entire series of Firefly, drink far more tea than is generally healthy for me, and probably indulge in some cake. Basically I’m gonna feel a bit sorry for myself and spend the next few days determinedly not thinking.
So I will be looking something like this.
Worry not, normal service will be resumed very shortly (I expect by the weekend if not sooner). Meanwhile, do have fun playing with the archives. They go all the way back to 2003 you know. Worth it, if only to laugh at how far my writing style has come!
I promise you, the Cas you all know and love will soon return bigger and better than ever before. Just… she needs to have a few days of hermit-mode first.
Huggles and love to y’all ![]()
~Cxxx~
Posted by in Housekeeping
On Wikipedia and Archaeology
I was flicking through the latest edition of British Archaeology recently (number 88) (I need to at least pretend I am keeping up with my field) and an article caught my eye. It was in the new(ish) column on “On The Web”, which always feels a little crammed and tacked on, but I’m not the editor, so there’s nothing I can do about it. Also, I would rather they were talking just a little bit about the topic than not at all. Each issue they look at an issue/website and try to get a page-long article out of it.
This time it was the role of internet sites as resources. This is good. The Web rates a big Yay! in my book, but the Web is underused as a resource, one of the main reasons cited for which, is that students don’t know where to start looking – a statement I have no problem with. Time and again, I get into discussions with people who say “but I just don’t know where to begin“.
So when a respected entry level journal such as British Archaeology lists some good portal sites, you listen. B.A. has the potential to reach thousands of new students and interested amateurs, and to shape their online researching habits for ever more, so a recommendation from them is a huge thing.
Which is why I was a little concerned that Wikipedia was mentioned as a great starting point. Don’t get me wrong, it is a great starting point, but a lot/most users don’t realise the very shaky factual foundations it stands upon. A straw poll of the users in the lab back when I was doing the Thesis showed that, whilst most of my colleagues would use Wikipedia regularly to check facts, the majority of them weren’t aware there was no official refereeing or verification methods in place. They were unaware that anyone could, and frequently did, submit articles and edit extant work. I myself was not aware till I started doing research into wikis in general.
Web-savy users know to treat most Internet sources slightly dubiously till we can verify them. If we can’t pin down an author and/or source for a fact, we tend to run for the hills. Or at least do some more digging. Most readers of B.A., I would hazzard a guess, are not that Web-savy. It is hard to teach people to be critical about everything we read – we are taught from an early age to respect and revere the written word. It goes against the grain to question something we see on the screen. For so long, there have been gatekeepers to publication – editors; peer review; the Church; money; education – that we assume it still holds true in this day and age when anyone with even an iota of inclination can get their words online and give them a veneer of authority. When you are greeted by an edifice such as Wikipedia, with its hundreds upon thousands of articles, it is almost unbelievable that such a thing could be allowed to exist if it wasn’t true.
To be published in a recognised journal (both print and many online) you go through the process of peer review. You have to prove that what you have written is repeatable and true. Yes, mistakes get made, but very few. With Wikipedia, whilst you still have to run the gamut of all the millions of other users, and the semi-god-like Editors, I imagine if you act enough like an authority then your word will become accepted as true. Studies have shown that Wikipedia has similar numbers of errors to established encyclopaedias such as the Encyclopaedia Britannica, but the nature of those errors is different. Wikipedia, when it stumbles, tends to get things wrong to a much greater degree. Also, encyclopaedias are never presented to students as good places to look for information. Starting points, yes. Finishing points? Not so much.
And then there is the treatment of those who are genuine experts in their field. danah experienced this first hand when she came face to face with her own bio on Wikipedia. Not only was there debate about whether she should even have an entry (and why shouldn’t she?) it was culturally inappropriate to edit her own page to correct information she knew (who better?) to be factually inaccurate. You have to question the veracity of any entry in Wikipedia when you are made aware of such glaring problems with particular entries. If an expert in a field is not considered the appropriate authority to talk about her own life, what about experts in other fields? There is a subtle but pervasive anti-establishment tone throughout Wikipedia. Yes, you might not like that professors and such are more knowledgeable in a given sphere than you are, but in many cases they are more knowledgeable. Listen to them. Learn from them.
I digress ever so slightly from my initial point, which was this: I worry that Wikipedia is being set up in as a site that can dispense gospel truth, and that it is being sold as such to the people who are the most vulnerable.
I am at a mental impasse. I want total freedom of knowledge. I want everyone to be able to get at all information. I want everyone to be able to add to that body of information without having to jump through hoops.
At the same time, I want that information to be checked and to be correct. However much I might wish for a total democratization of information, there needs to be mechanisms in place where the genuine authorities on a given subject are able to step in and correct mistakes.
I am not for locking away knowledge for the privileged few, nor am I advocating keeping the less knowledgeable away from information. I would, however, recommend caution. For the majority of people, small inaccuracies in Wikipedia and sources like it will have no affect on their lives. They have no desire, or need, to know more. There are, however, people who want more in-depth knowledge and it might be better (for example) if they were first presented with the archaeological facts as we have them, before being introduced to theories about how the pyramids served as landing platforms for aliens.
I agree Wikipedia is a wonderful resource and a great place to act as a jump-point to more in-depth knowledge. I frequently use it as such myself. But I am hesitant to place such an onus on it as British Archaeology does, naming in the same paragraph as some respected, established, and verified portals and sties. I could argue that archaeology (and other disciplines) need to descend en masse on Wikipedia and correct/verify all the information pertaining to our fields that we can find. But such a plan is sure to backfire and mire us all in allegations of Ivory Tower-dom and academic elitism. The alternative of starting our own Wikipedia for archaeology is also doomed – you’re just never gonna get the consensus or collaboration across the discipline on the scale that is required.
My solution? Urge caution. Use Wikipedia, sure, but use other sources as well. Be skeptical. If you find a problem with Wikipedia, edit it. If you find another good site, tell people about it. But most importantly, never stop questioning what is put on the page or screen in front of you. Use the brain that whatever deity you see fit to believe in, put between your ears.
EDIT/UPDATE:
It pays to read your archives before you publish a long rant. I had a sneaking feeling I’ve touched on this topic a time or two before, and sure enough I have. Ah well, now you can enjoy that article too
Posted by in Research Ramble
Belated Unofficial Chocolate Guinness Birthday Cake
The 8th of May was my unofficial birthday. To cut a long and rather depressing story short, I don’t like to make a big fuss over my real birthday. A few years back Tiana decided in which case we needed to celebrate my birth on some other day. This day (and the reason why did make sense at the time I promise you) was the 8th of May.
Recently, I’ve not really celebrated my unofficial birthday either. I’m never one for a fuss, and I hate surprises, so people don’t tend to give me surprises. This does backfire somewhat when it comes to parties, but ah well. This year, the day itself passed with very little note indeed, but I came home on Friday evening to discover a large cake sitting on my shelf in the fridge – Moose had got baking. She said it was because she felt bad not to have done something for my unofficial birthday, but I reckon she just wanted to bake and was using that as an excuse.
Not that this is a bad thing. Cake is, after all, cake, and this is a particularly good cake!
As quite a lot of Nigella’s cake recipes are, it’s unusual, but works really really well:
Chocolate Guinness Cake
For the cake:
- 250 ml Guinness
- 250 g unsalted butter
- 75 g cocoa
- 400 g caster sugar
- 142 ml sour cream
- 2 eggs – from happy hens (that is free range). This doesn’t affect the taste, but it will affect your karma
- t tbsp real vanilla extract
- 275 g plain flour – that is flour without rising agent added
- 2 1/2 tsp bicarbonate of soda
For the icing:
- 300 g Philadelphia cream cheese – Moose used generic and it didn’t set very well. Have to assume that real Philly works better
- 150 g icing sugar
- 125 ml double or whipping cream
Instructions:
- Preheat the oven to gas mark 4 / 180oc, butter and line a 23 cm springform tin
- Pour the Guinness into a large wide saucepan, add the butter gradually, and heat until the butter has melted. At which time, whisk in the cocoa and sugar.
- Beat the sour cream with the eggs and vanilla and pour into the brown, buttery, beery pan and finally whisk in the bicarb and flour.
- Pour the cake batter into the greased, lined tin and bake for 45 minutes to an hour. Leave to cool completely in the tin on a cooling rack as it is quite a damp cake.
- Lightly whip the cream cheese until smooth, sieve over the icing sugar, then beat together. Add the cream and beat again until it makes a spreadable consistency. Ice the top of the black cake so that it resembles the frothy top of a pint.
– A few tips that the book won’t tell you:
This needs longer to cook than less – if it looks wibbly in the middle when you take it out of the oven, it probably isn’t done yet. We’ve not worked out the optimum cooking time, but rest assured we will keep trying!
The middle will probably sink, and it will ooze a bit of Guinness, but keep it in the fridge, and it tastes amazing!
Probably not suitable for the young or teetotal.
I’d hate to think what the calorie count of just a slice of this is, but who cares, right? It’s cake, and cake isn’t meant to be good for you. Enjoy
Posted by in Daily Waffle, Recipes
Sunday Roast: death by Jello is very unlikely
Bit of a departure for me this week – the quote in the title has absolutely no connection to the content of the post whatsoever. I spent an age trying to find a good quote, but I just couldn’t find one. Seeing as how life really is too short, and I have better things to do with it, I decided to that as this one made me laugh it was as worthy as anything else.
All that is my way of saying “don’t bust your brains looking for a connection, ’cause there ain’t one”. If you want to tell me what film it’s from though, go ahead
(For newer readers, each week the Sunday Roast has a quote in the title, and that quote usually has at least a tenuous link to the content of the post. They make look arbitrary but, this week aside, they aren’t. And you get Brownie Points, and sometimes cookies, if you guess correctly).
Apparently, the government is reviewing whether ‘core British values’ should be part of the curriculum for 11 to 16-year-olds. My first question is this: what on earth are core British values? A certain love of fish and chips, curry, an inability to shine at any sport (even the ones we invented), and irresponsible behavior at football matches? Most people of one group or another will be able to tell you something of their core values. The Cornish will have a good idea, as will the Scots, the Irish, and let’s not forget the Welsh! But to be British? That one I can’t help you on. I can’t believe I’m about to agree (partially) with what a Conservative said, but Boris Johnson was partly right when he said we need to teach British History. Learn anything about British history and you will discover that to be British is to be a mix of everything. It is to take bits and pieces from everywhere, and to learn from everyone (I wonder how many staunch Jingoistic pensioners live in bungalows (Hindi), drink tea (Chinese/Indian) or coffee (African), eat chocolate (South American), watch TV (Scottish), use the telephone (again, Scots), and enjoy pasta (Italian). The list could go on).
I’ve not tried this yet, but this song tapper could be so useful! Especially as I’m always getting obscure songs stuck in my head, but can’t sing/hum to save my life, so have no way of identifying them.
I can’t remember if I’ve linked to this great tool before or not, but if you are on the look out for a new (Blogger) design, look no further than the Firdamatic: the design tool for the uninspired webloggers.
Performancing has a piece on bug check your blog. I must admit I’ve been a bit of a chicken and haven’t done this to Bright Meadow in a while. I just don’t want to know what’s not correct – I just know if I start on one thing, the entire house of cards is gonna come tumbling down. Definitely a case of do as I say, not do as I do!
For all you photobloggers out there, Kristin has a great tutorial on how to set up a photoblog on wordpress. Even if you don’t want to set up a photoblog of your own, do go drool at Kristin’s own photoblog. Pretty pictures!
A while back I wrote something on the need (or not) for an ‘About’ page. If you’re still in doubt, read what Brian has to say on the topic. (Also, writing a good ‘About’ page is harder than you’d think. Still not happy with my own. Grr).
Stowe first brought them to my attention. Steve decided there needed to be a bookmarklet. And here is mine. Only one person has favourited me. I’m curious as to who this one person is, and pissed off that Technorati are using Alexa for their traffic details because it looks like I’m a Billy-No-Traffic. I’m not. My traffic may be small, but it’s perfectly formed
Ofcom are rethinking their ban on the iTrip. I must admit to the fact I have one of these gadgets, received as a gift from a parental unit so I could use the iPod in a car that had no tape deck for a converter. Problem is, the frequency it is tuned to, whilst empty in the States, is slap bang in the middle of the frequency used by Radio 2 in this country, so I’ve never used the gadget in question! Would be nice if we Brit’s could get iTrips of our very own to use.
A while back Darren talked about the cost of comment spam and mentioned that certain high profile blogs were just letting it through. I couldn’t believe that anyone would do that, till I stumbled across one such blog in the course of chasing down links this week. I was going to name and shame, but then I remembered that I’m meant to be nice, so I won’t. I will say, however, that it’s reaffirmed in my mind my distaste for this blogger and made his/her reputation even lower in my eyes. There is no excuse given the great tools available. Then again, I now know where to go if I ever want a dodgy GSM phone…
Continuing my quest to make you all use coComment, there’s new widget in town that makes displaying of your latest coComments even easier. I like the simple list of names (last time I tried the ‘blog box’ of comments it took too long to load), but just because it ain’t for me doesn’t mean you won’ t like this
I’d thought I’d out grown migraines (or knew all my triggers and avoided them like the plague), but since three migraines in the past few months could indicate I haven’t, it makes me all kind of glad that UK pharmacies can now sell a migraine drug that actually works.
And lastly, finding out that people are stealing/republishing your content is generally annoying, but when a post about submitting to a blog network gets republished on a site about dating in Spain, there really is nothing to do but laugh. A lot.
Posted by in Sunday Roast



Recent Comments